The Future of Data Centers in Henry County, Part 4

How Will Henry County Decide?

Over the past three weeks, we've explored why the demand for data centers has grown so rapidly, examined the potential benefits and concerns they present, and looked at the questions Henry County hopes to answer during its one-year moratorium.

If a company eventually proposes building a data center in Henry County, one question will remain:

How will the decision actually be made?

The answer is through a public process involving multiple boards, agencies, technical experts, utility providers and, ultimately, the residents of Henry County.

A project of this size would not be approved in a single meeting, nor would it be decided by one elected official.

Instead, it would likely move through months of review, public discussion, and technical evaluation.

Public Input Starts Before the Vote

One of the biggest misconceptions about local government is that public participation happens only after a decision has already been made. In reality, public input is most valuable before elected officials cast their votes.

Residents often know local conditions better than anyone else. They understand traffic patterns, drainage issues, nearby neighborhoods, agricultural concerns, emergency response capabilities, and the history of previous developments.

Just as importantly, they often ask questions government officials or developers may not have considered.

A strong public process doesn't guarantee everyone will agree with the outcome. It does help ensure decisions are made with the best available information.

The Role of the Planning & Development Committee

The Henry County Planning & Development Committee would likely be one of the first groups to review a proposed project. Its responsibility isn't simply to decide whether members personally support or oppose a development.

Instead, the committee examines whether the proposal complies with county ordinances and whether additional conditions or recommendations should be considered before forwarding the project to the full County Board.

Committee members may review issues such as:

  • Zoning compatibility

  • Site location

  • Land use

  • Infrastructure

  • Utility availability

  • Environmental considerations

  • Public comments

  • Proposed conditions of approval

The committee's recommendation helps shape the discussion but does not necessarily determine the final outcome.

The Role of the County Board

Ultimately, significant land-use decisions rest with the Henry County Board.

Board members must balance many competing priorities, including:

  • Economic development

  • Property rights

  • Agriculture

  • Infrastructure

  • Public safety

  • Long-term planning

  • Fiscal responsibility

  • Community concerns

Board members are responsible not only for today's residents but also for decisions that may affect the county for decades.

Their vote represents the final local policy decision after technical reviews and public input have been considered.

Who Else May Be Involved?

A project of this size would likely involve far more than county government.

Depending on the proposal, reviews or approvals could involve:

Electric Utility Providers

  • Determining whether sufficient electrical capacity exists.

  • Evaluating substations and transmission needs.

  • Planning infrastructure improvements.

Water Providers

  • Reviewing water availability.

  • Determining service capacity.

  • Evaluating impacts on existing customers.

Henry County Office of Emergency Management

  • Reviewing emergency response plans.

  • Coordinating with fire protection districts.

  • Identifying specialized training needs.

Fire Protection Districts

  • Evaluating fire suppression systems.

  • Reviewing emergency access.

  • Planning response procedures.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (if applicable)

  • Reviewing permits related to environmental regulations.

  • Evaluating wastewater or other regulated activities when required.

Illinois Department of Transportation (if applicable)

  • Reviewing access to state highways if necessary.

Other state or federal agencies may also become involved depending on the size, location and specific features of a proposed project.

What Does a Zoning Hearing Look Like?

For many residents, a zoning hearing may be unfamiliar.

While every hearing is different, the process generally follows a structured format.

It often includes:

  1. Staff presentation summarizing the proposal.

  2. The developer presents the project.

  3. Questions from committee or commission members.

  4. Public comments from supporters, opponents, and neighboring property owners.

  5. Additional questions from officials.

  6. Deliberation.

  7. A recommendation or vote.

The purpose of the hearing is not simply to count supporters and opponents.

It is to create a public record, gather facts and allow decision-makers to evaluate testimony before making a recommendation.

Questions Worth Asking

Public meetings are often most productive when residents focus on information rather than positions.

Instead of asking only, "Should we allow a data center?" residents may find it more helpful to ask:

About Infrastructure

  • Can the electrical grid support the project?

  • Will roads require improvements?

  • Who pays for those improvements?

About Water

  • How much water will be used?

  • What type of cooling system is proposed?

  • Could nearby users be affected?

About the Economy

  • How many permanent jobs are expected?

  • What tax revenue is projected?

  • Are tax incentives being requested?

  • What local businesses could benefit?

About Community Impact

  • How will noise be measured?

  • What landscaping or screening is planned?

  • How will neighboring properties be protected?

About the Future

  • What happens if ownership changes?

  • What happens if the facility closes?

  • Who is responsible for removing equipment or restoring the property?

Questions like these move the conversation beyond opinions and toward informed decision-making.

If a Proposal Is Approved

Approval would not necessarily mean construction begins the next day.

Developers may still need to:

  • Finalize engineering plans.

  • Obtain permits.

  • Complete utility agreements.

  • Meet conditions established by the county.

  • Coordinate with contractors.

  • Begin infrastructure improvements.

Construction itself could take months or even years, depending on the project's size.

Throughout that process, developers would generally remain responsible for complying with local ordinances, permit requirements and any conditions attached to the approval.

If a Proposal Is Denied

A denial does not necessarily end the conversation forever.

Depending on the circumstances, a developer might:

  • Revise the proposal.

  • Select another location.

  • Wait until county regulations change.

  • Appeal through legal processes if permitted under applicable law.

Likewise, the county could continue refining its ordinances as technology and community priorities evolve.

Local land-use planning is an ongoing process, not a one-time decision.

An Informed Community Makes Better Decisions

Throughout this series, one message has remained consistent.

The discussion about data centers should not begin with "yes" or "no."

It should begin with information.

Henry County's moratorium provides time to understand an industry that is expanding rapidly across the country, to develop thoughtful local regulations and to ensure that if a proposal ever arrives, it will be evaluated through a transparent public process.

Whether Henry County eventually welcomes a data center or decides another path is best, residents deserve a process that is open, informed and grounded in facts.

Editor's Note

This four-part series was created to explain one of the fastest-growing industries in the world and how it could intersect with Henry County in the years ahead. It was not intended to advocate for or against data centers, but to provide readers with the background needed to participate in an informed public conversation if a proposal is ever brought before the county.

Additional resources on both sides of the issues

New Illinois E-Bike Law Sets Age Limits, Bans Sidewalk Riding

Illinois residents will face new statewide rules for electric bicycles, scooters and other small electric vehicles beginning Jan. 1, 2027.

Gov. JB Pritzker signed Senate Bill 3484 on Aug. 26, creating age requirements, speed restrictions and operating rules for what the state calls “electric micromobility devices.” The legislation is now Public Act 104-0854.

The law covers more than traditional e-bikes. It also addresses high-powered electric bikes sometimes marketed as e-motos, along with electric scooters, skateboards and unicycles.

For most adults who own conventional e-bikes, the most significant changes involve where the bikes may be ridden. Families with younger riders, however, will also need to pay close attention to the law’s new minimum-age requirements.

New Age Requirements

Illinois will retain its existing three-class system for conventional e-bikes:

  • A Class 1 e-bike provides assistance only while the rider is pedaling and stops assisting at 20 mph.

  • A Class 2 e-bike can propel the bicycle without pedaling but stops providing power at 20 mph.

  • A Class 3 e-bike provides assistance while the rider is pedaling and stops assisting at 28 mph.

Beginning Jan. 1, riders must be at least 15 years old to operate Class 1 or Class 2 e-bikes. Riders must be at least 16 to operate Class 3 e-bikes.

The Class 1 and Class 2 limits represent a significant change. Illinois currently has no statewide minimum age for those two categories, while the minimum age for Class 3 riders is already 16.

All electric-scooter riders will also have to be at least 16.

The legislation includes an additional passenger restriction. A rider younger than 18 generally may not carry a passenger on a low-speed electric or gas-powered bicycle unless the passenger is the rider’s sibling, stepsibling, child or stepchild.

E-Bikes Will Be Prohibited on Sidewalks

The law prohibits e-bikes and electric scooters from being operated on sidewalks statewide.

Conventional Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 e-bikes may generally be used on streets and in bike lanes. They may also be permitted on bike paths and trails, although the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, park districts, forest preserve districts, conservation districts and transit districts retain authority to regulate e-bike use on property under their control.

That distinction could matter on locally managed recreational trails: being legal under the Illinois Vehicle Code does not necessarily guarantee that every class of e-bike will be permitted on every trail.

Electric scooters, skateboards and unicycles may be operated on roads with speed limits of 35 mph or less. They may be used along roads with higher speed limits only when a bike lane is available, and they may not be operated on highways.

Battery-powered toy vehicles intended for young children are treated separately and are expected to remain on sidewalks and paths.

Faster Devices Will Be Treated More Like Motorcycles

The law draws an important line at 28 mph and 750 watts.

Traditional Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 e-bikes—with working pedals, motors of no more than 750 watts and assisted speeds no higher than 28 mph—will not require a driver’s license, title, registration or liability insurance.

But higher-powered electric bikes and e-motos will be treated as motor-driven cycles. Riders must be at least 16 and will need a valid driver’s license, registration and insurance. Qualifying vehicles will also be subject to titling requirements, although the legislation provides different title treatment for some devices purchased before the law takes effect.

Those higher-powered vehicles must be operated on roadways rather than sidewalks, bike lanes or bicycle paths.

The distinction is likely to affect devices that look like bicycles but perform more like mopeds or motorcycles. Some are sold online as e-bikes despite having motors considerably more powerful than 750 watts or being capable of speeds well above 28 mph.

For consumers, the advertised name of the product will matter less than its actual motor rating and speed capability.

Speed Is Limited Even When a Device Can Go Faster

Electric scooters, skateboards and unicycles may not be operated faster than 28 mph on public roads, bike lanes or paths, even if the device is mechanically capable of reaching a higher speed.

High-speed e-bikes and e-motos are placed in the motor-driven-cycle category instead. That subjects their operators to licensing and vehicle requirements that do not apply to conventional e-bikes.

Violations may result in fines, and police may confiscate or impound devices in some circumstances. Riders will also remain subject to other applicable traffic laws.

Why Illinois Changed the Law

Supporters said Illinois law had not kept pace with increasingly fast and powerful electric vehicles.

Before the legislation, the state had no comprehensive classification for some electric devices capable of exceeding 28 mph. State officials say certain models can reach 50 mph or more, despite being marketed or perceived as bicycles.

The Secretary of State’s office also cited a national increase in injuries involving micromobility devices. According to the office, related injuries and fatalities rose 300% from 2019 through 2022. Several serious or fatal Illinois crashes involving teenage riders also occurred during the summer of 2026.

The legislation passed the Illinois House 84-16. The Senate initially approved the bill 55-0 and later voted 48-7 to accept the House amendment containing the final micromobility provisions.

The Secretary of State plans to conduct a public-awareness campaign, update driver-education materials and provide guidance to law-enforcement agencies, schools, municipalities, riders and retailers before implementation.

Geneseo City Council to Discuss E-Bikes

The issue will also receive local attention before the statewide law takes effect.

The Geneseo City Council is scheduled to discuss e-bikes during its Sept. 22 Committee of the Whole meeting.

Committee of the Whole meetings are generally used for discussion and direction rather than final action. Any specific local changes would require subsequent City Council action.

What Owners and Parents Should Check

Before the law takes effect, Illinois e-bike owners should locate the manufacturer’s label or specifications and determine:

  • Whether the bike is Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3

  • Its motor’s rated wattage

  • The maximum speed at which the motor provides assistance

  • Whether it has fully operable pedals

  • Whether a younger rider meets the new minimum-age requirement

  • Whether the device will require a license, registration, title or insurance

  • Whether the agency managing a particular trail permits that type of e-bike

The practical dividing line is straightforward: conventional e-bikes that remain within the three-class, 750-watt system continue to be treated largely like bicycles. Devices that exceed those limits may legally be considered motor-driven cycles—regardless of what the manufacturer or seller calls them.

Sources

Five Soccer Fields, Pickleball and a Splash Pad: Inside Geneseo’s Proposed Sports Complex

A preliminary plan for the proposed Seth Ernst Memorial Sports Complex provides a more detailed look at what could eventually be built on approximately 26 acres near Interstate 80 in Geneseo.

The concept, prepared by Hutchison Engineering and dated July 20, shows five irrigated soccer fields, pickleball courts, a playground, splash pad, concessions and restroom facilities, shelters and approximately 490 parking spaces.

The details follow Tuesday's presentation to the Geneseo City Council, when Dave and Betty Ernst discussed donating approximately 26 acres for the Seth Ernst Memorial Sports Complex. The property is located near I-80 and the city's wind turbines. No construction plan or city funding commitment was approved at that meeting.

The new details also provide an early estimate of the project's potential cost. Notes provided to The Current indicate the complex, as currently planned, is estimated at approximately $6 million to $7 million and is intended to be privately funded.

Five Soccer Fields Anchor the Plan

Soccer would occupy much of the proposed complex.

The preliminary plan shows three full-size, 74-by-120-yard soccer fields and two standard high-school-sized, 65-by-110-yard fields.

That aligns with the need organizers described to the council Tuesday. Ernst said 439 children are participating in Geneseo soccer this fall, and organizers have discussed the need for additional fields for close to a decade.

Richmond Hill currently provides park greenspace that is used for games, but organizers said space and parking can limit the size of tournaments Geneseo can accommodate. A larger complex near I-80 could potentially draw visiting teams and families while creating additional traffic for local restaurants, hotels, and businesses.

The preliminary plan goes beyond soccer.

It identifies pickleball courts near the west end of the property, along with a playground and splash pad farther into the complex.

Parking and On-Site Facilities

Parking represents another substantial part of the concept.

Four parking areas shown on the preliminary plan contain a total of 490 spaces.

The concept includes a 50-by-110-foot concessions, restroom and equipment building, along with two 30-by-44-foot shelters with restrooms.

Water, Septic and Site Work

Developing the property would require significant infrastructure.

The preliminary plan includes the infrastructure needed to support the complex, including water service, stormwater drainage and septic systems.

Significant grading would also be required to prepare the property for development.

Plans also call for sidewalks, playing surfaces, maintained lawn areas and native grasses throughout the site.

Access Remains a Key Question

One of the biggest issues still to be resolved is how vehicles would reach the complex.

The preliminary plan shows an access drive near the I-80/Illinois Route 82 area. Project notes identify the need for an Illinois Department of Transportation entrance from Route 82, with traffic analysis and additional studies among the next steps.

That expands on the access discussion at Tuesday's council meeting, when city officials said they would investigate right-of-way near the city's wind turbine property and determine whether an existing approach could potentially provide access.

Partnerships and Funding Still to Be Developed

Organizers plan to seek partnerships with local businesses and organizations as the project develops.

At Tuesday's meeting, organizers said contributions would be funneled through the nonprofit associated with the Seth Ernst Memorial Soccer Slam and used to pay project expenses.

The preliminary $6 million to $7 million figure is not an approved city expenditure, and the materials provided to The Current describe the project as privately funded in its current form.

For now, the concept provides a considerably clearer picture of the scale being considered: five soccer fields, nearly 500 parking spaces and several additional recreation amenities on a 26-acre site along the interstate — with access, infrastructure, private funding and community partnerships among the major pieces still to be worked out.  

The Future of Data Centers in Henry County, Part 3

What Henry County Needs to Decide

For the past two weeks, we've explored why data centers are being built at an unprecedented pace and examined the potential benefits and concerns they bring to the communities that host them.

Now the focus shifts to Henry County.

In June, the Henry County Board approved a 12-month moratorium on new data center projects. The decision wasn't intended to stop development permanently. Instead, county leaders chose to pause, gather information, and determine whether Henry County's current regulations are sufficient—or whether new rules should be in place before a proposal ever reaches the County Board.

A Pause to Plan

Data centers are unlike most developments the county has considered in the past.

A new subdivision, manufacturing facility, or retail business each presents its own challenges. But modern data centers bring unique questions involving electricity, water, technology infrastructure, emergency response, and long-term land use.

Rather than waiting until an application arrives, county officials have opted to establish expectations in advance.

The goal is simple: create a fair, transparent process that protects the public while giving developers a clear understanding of the county's requirements.

Where Should They Be Allowed?

One of the first decisions the county may need to make is where data centers could be built. Space needs range from 15-30 acres for a small facility, 30-150 acres for an average data center, and up to 150-500+ acres for “hyperscale” centers.

Throughout the Henry County moratorium, the board will be considering questions like:

  • Should they be limited to industrially zoned property?

  • Should they be located near existing electrical, utility, or stormwater infrastructure?

  • Should productive farmland receive additional protections?

  • Should minimum setbacks be required from homes, schools, parks, or other sensitive areas? Will any additional landscaping/ screening be required?

  • Are safeguards in place to protect farmland and our rural character?

The answers will shape not only whether a project is approved, but where one could realistically be proposed.

How Much Power Is Too Much?

Modern data centers consume large amounts of power, and future facilities are expected to require even more as technology needs continues to expand.

Issues that are not properly addressed upfront can cause increased electricity bills:

  • need for new substations, transmission lines, or equipment

  • higher capacity requirements

  • stranded (abandoned) projects

  • increased wholesale prices due to increased demand

  • local grid updates

Addressing these issues prior to approval may involve:

  • an infrastructure payment agreement

  • a utility cost-impact study

  • separate utility rates so the data center pays its fair share (also known as a separate large-load rate treatment)

  • exit and stranded cost protections

  • agreed-upon expansion triggers

  • public reporting and accountability measures

  • third-party regulator reviews

While utilities ultimately determine whether power can be supplied, the county may require developers to document those plans before a project moves forward.

How Will Water Be Managed?

Not every data center uses the same cooling technology. Some rely primarily on outside air. Others use water-based cooling systems. Still others use hybrid designs that reduce water consumption while maintaining efficient operation. Water consumption ranges from as much as 5 million gallons daily to nearly zero, depending on the cooling system and the size of the facility.

Before considering a project, the county may want developers to identify:

  • Acceptable cooling systems

  • Estimated daily water use

  • The source of the water

  • Potential impacts on nearby water systems

  • Plans for drought conditions

  • Wastewater management

  • Maximum annual withdrawal and consumption caps

  • Water usage and monitoring measures

What About Noise?

Unlike factories, data centers typically don't produce smoke or heavy truck traffic. They do, however, operate 24 hours a day. Cooling equipment, transformers, ventilation systems, and backup generators all create sound.

Many communities establish measurable noise standards instead of relying on subjective descriptions like "too loud."

Possible standards could address:

  • Maximum daytime noise

  • Maximum nighttime noise

  • Property-line measurements

  • Generator testing schedules

  • Required sound barriers or landscaping

  • Quieter equipment

  • Noise monitoring, complaint, and response plans

Clear standards provide certainty for both residents and developers.

Emergency Preparedness

Data centers contain sophisticated electrical equipment, backup power systems, batteries, and fire suppression systems.

Although these facilities are designed with multiple layers of safety, local emergency responders still need to have the tools and training to respond appropriately to potential emergencies.

County officials may ask:

  • What specialized training would responders need?

  • Would additional equipment be necessary?

  • How would emergency access be maintained?

  • What information should fire departments receive before construction?

These discussions often occur long before a building permit is issued.

Roads and Infrastructure

A project of this size could affect roads, utilities, and other public infrastructure. Construction may require heavy equipment and frequent deliveries. Electrical service may require upgrades. Fiber-optic connections may need expansion.

One important question is who pays for those improvements. Many communities negotiate development agreements that clearly assign responsibility before construction begins.

County officials may formalize expectations regarding:

  • road repairs for wear and tear caused by construction traffic

  • upgrades to roads, bridges, and intersections

  • traffic control, signage, and safety measures

  • dust control and cleanup

  • construction hours

Air Pollution

Data centers rely on backup generators to keep critical systems running during outages. When these generators run or are tested, they emit pollution, including:

  • nitrogen oxides

  • particulate matter

  • carbon monoxide

  • volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

  • carbon dioxide

  • other toxins including formaldehyde, benzene, and others

Limiting those pollutants or outlining expectations requires policies outlining:

  • generator testing schedules

  • generator maintenance runs

  • fuel used in generators

  • location relative to prevailing winds and nearby homes, schools, businesses

  • stack height and dispersion modeling

Data center generators are regulated as stationery engines under the Clean Air Act.

Weighing the Choice

Supporters often point to the economic impact of data centers, while opponents often question whether those benefits justify the project's size and infrastructure needs.

Rather than relying on estimates or assumptions, the moratorium allows Henry County the opportunity to evaluate measurable information, including:

  • Expected property tax revenue

  • Potential tax incentives

  • Construction investment

  • Temporary construction jobs

  • Permanent employment

  • Local purchasing commitments

  • Infrastructure contributions

  • Long-term maintenance obligations

Looking beyond the headline investment number allows decision-makers to understand a project's overall impact on the community.

Should Henry County Create New Rules?

One of the biggest questions during the moratorium is whether the county's existing zoning regulations are enough.

Many communities have concluded that data centers deserve their own standards because of their unique infrastructure needs.

A future ordinance could address issues such as:

  • Appropriate zoning districts

  • Minimum lot size

  • Building height

  • Setbacks

  • Landscaping and screening

  • Noise limits

  • Water reporting

  • Utility documentation

  • Emergency response planning

  • Road-use agreements

  • Environmental requirements

  • Financial guarantees

  • Decommissioning plans if a facility eventually closes

The purpose of those standards wouldn't necessarily be to encourage or discourage development. Their purpose would be to ensure every proposal is evaluated using clear, consistent, and transparent criteria.

Looking Beyond One Project

The decisions Henry County makes during this moratorium could shape how the county evaluates technology-related development for decades.

Strong regulations provide clarity for residents, developers, and elected officials alike. Poorly defined regulations can create uncertainty for everyone involved.

The coming months give Henry County an opportunity to ask difficult questions before difficult decisions have to be made.

Next in the series: How would a data center proposal actually move from concept to construction? In the final installment, we'll walk through the decision-making process, the roles of local, state, and utility partners, and how residents can participate as plans take shape.

Sources:

Stumphy’s Plans New Location as Restaurant Prepares to Leave Sugar Maple

Stumphy’s Restaurant & Bar is preparing for a move, with plans to relocate from its current location at Sugar Maple Golf Club to a new space.

The restaurant hopes to have a new location selected by the end of this week. The Sugar Maple location will remain open until October.

The move does not mean Sugar Maple Golf Club is closing. The golf course will remain open and continue operating.

Stumphy’s currently employs 18 staff members, and minimizing the amount of time between locations is a priority as plans move forward.

A specific new location has not yet been announced. Though, The Current has confirmed that they will not be relocating within Geneseo.

The planned relocation marks a new chapter for Stumphy’s, which has operated from the clubhouse at Sugar Maple Golf Club outside Geneseo since April 2026. Once a location is finalized, additional information about the restaurant’s transition and reopening will be announced.

The Current will update this story as additional information becomes available.